As a prepaid card product launched by Starbucks, the Star Gift Card has long suffered from issues such as limited recharge amounts, excessively high card refund fees, and the inability to clear remaining balances. Four university students discovered during their consumption that when the remaining balance on a Star Gift Card was only 19 yuan, they could neither purchase any Starbucks product nor get a refund to clear the balance. After investigation, they found that the prepaid cards of several tea beverage brands did not have such restrictions. Therefore, in June 2023, they filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, ultimately prompting Starbucks to update the Star Gift Card terms, lower the card refund fee, eliminate the minimum charge, allow custom recharge amounts, and cancel the extension management fee. [more…]

The issue of Starbucks Star Gift Card extension management fees has repeatedly been thrust into the spotlight in recent years. Although the controversy has persisted for several years, consumers have recently reported that their Star Gift Cards were continuously charged this fee without their knowledge. From Mr. Gu's experience to Ms. Zhang's case of being charged for 22 months, and the endless complaints on the Black Cat platform, is this charging mechanism a reasonable rule or a failure to fulfill the obligation to remind? Consumers and Starbucks each hold their own views, arguing endlessly. This article will sort out the whole story, the views of all parties, and the official terms, to help you understand this long-running dispute. [more…]

Coffee chain giant Starbucks has once again become the focus of public opinion, this time due to a Douyin platform promotion offering coupons for two Flat White coffees for 0.01 yuan. After grabbing the coupons, many consumers were told they could not be redeemed and the system automatically refunded them, sparking widespread dissatisfaction. Starbucks subsequently issued an apology, explaining that an internal test link had been mistakenly activated. However, the incident did not die down, as legal experts pointed out that the merchant's unilateral cancellation of the contract may constitute a breach. Meanwhile, Starbucks is accelerating expansion and adjusting its marketing strategy in the Chinese market, frequently launching promotional offers. This article reviews the course of the incident, the reactions of various parties, and Starbucks' recent moves. Front Street Coffee also continues to follow developments in the coffee industry. [more…]

A super value 5-time card launched on Luckin Coffee's Tmall flagship store quickly triggered a buying frenzy because it was priced as low as 13.77 yuan for any 5 cups chosen from 15 classic drinks. However, in the early hours of the next day, many consumers had their orders forcibly refunded by the platform on the grounds of "no longer wanted" without any refund operation on their part, and some, although shown as shipped, did not receive the electronic vouchers. Luckin later explained that a system configuration error had triggered automatic refunds and offered a 32-yuan drink voucher as compensation. But some consumers were not convinced, believing that the brand's unilateral cancellation of the contract amounted to a breach of contract or even fraud, and have filed lawsuits in court demanding reasonable compensation. The incident exposed the performance risks in the sale of electronic discount vouchers and the issue of consumer rights protection. [more…]

A couple who explicitly chose not to leave a tip at Starbucks were charged an exorbitant $4,444.44 (about 30,264 yuan) because they didn't check the bill, maxing out their credit card and forcing them to cancel a trip to visit family in Thailand. The store initially refused a refund, then agreed to send a check that couldn't be cashed; after police intervened, Starbucks quickly reissued the check and refunded the full amount. The incident has raised concerns about point-of-sale system glitches and how businesses handle such matters. This article walks you through what happened and the findings of the investigation. [more…]

Recently, Starbucks star gift cards have triggered multiple consumer complaints due to automatically deducting a monthly deferred management fee after expiration and lacking clear notifications. Some users reported that the deductions continued for 22 months before they偶然 discovered it, and when they called customer service, they were told that the practice was compliant. An investigation found that although the relevant terms are displayed in bold in the App, users are not required to actively confirm reading them during the binding process. In addition, the activation time is not marked on the star gift card, and consumers' understanding of the "date of activation" differs from the official definition. This article will sort out the focus of complaints, the details of the rules, and the core of the dispute, and explore the boundary between the reasonableness of prepaid card deductions and users' right to be informed. [more…]

Recently, a post about 1 Dian Dian's navy salt salted milk green tea charging an extra 2 yuan for added salt sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some customers, following online guides, asked for extra salt, only to be told that one pump of salt costs 2 yuan, which was far from their expectations. Subsequently, 1 Dian Dian employees and official customer service explained that the "salt" is actually a relatively expensive navy salt rock sugar flavor syrup, and according to company policy, additional additions require payment. Although the store has apologized for the incorrect price quote, netizens have derived a new question: since adding sugar costs money, should customers who order less sugar or no sugar also get a refund for the corresponding syrup price difference? This debate about the pricing logic of tea drinks quickly became a topic of interest for coffee and tea enthusiasts. [more…]

A customer at a Starbucks Reserve store, while paying with a Starbucks Card, discovered that two drinks had been upgraded by default to the pricier Reserve coffee, and during the ordering process the staff never mentioned the word "Reserve." This "default Reserve" incident sparked widespread discussion, with many netizens sharing similar experiences, and a former Starbucks employee also revealed it may be related to KPI assessments. Starbucks customer service initially gave a vague response, but the store eventually admitted the mistake and promised a refund. At the heart of the incident are customers' right to be informed and their right to choose, and it also prompts reflection on where exactly the boundary lies between ordering at a Reserve store and a regular store. [more…]

Starbucks Japan recently issued an announcement admitting that from September 2014 to January 2024, 164 types of coffee beans across its nationwide stores were sold above their listed prices due to a defect in the cash register system settings. Over the ten-year period, a total of 5,896 bags of affected products were sold, with overcharges amounting to 124,033 yen. The company has corrected the system and issued an apology, while offering three refund options: stored-value card members will automatically receive the difference back, while other customers need to bring a receipt or provide purchase information to handle it at the counter. Netizens generally believe the time span is too long and the amounts too small, and suggest apologizing with more practical compensation such as drink vouchers. [more…]

The extraction time for a cup of Americano actually escalated to the 12315 complaint platform? Recently, a netizen ordered an Americano at a coffee shop in Shenzhen and believed that the barista's extraction time exceeded 90 seconds, far beyond the 40-second standard in their understanding, so they demanded a refund and complained to 12315, also requesting that the merchant remove the product from sale. This incident sparked heated discussion in the coffee community: Is there any hard-and-fast rule for the extraction time of espresso? Is it reasonable for consumers to complain about a shop based on their personal standards? This article will recount the incident, sort out the industry reference range for espresso extraction time, and explore the boundary between consumer rights protection and product standards. [more…]

Recently, the rise in delivery fees on food delivery platforms has sparked heated discussion among coffee merchants. Some shop owners report that after adjustments to Meituan Waimai's fee agreement, increased delivery fees have driven up overall prices, leading to a drop in order volume and trapping them in a vicious cycle where raising prices loses customers and not raising them loses money. Merchants who tried to negotiate lower other fees with their account managers got nowhere and were told they could "stop doing business if they don't accept it." Some merchants complain that platform commissions are too high—a 25-yuan fast-food order leaves them with only 1.24 yuan, and some even end up with negative income. Faced with this dilemma, experienced merchants suggest shifting mindset: leveraging the traffic advantages of food delivery, using activities like punch cards to funnel online customers to offline stores, while rationally studying the activity rules to avoid blindly following suggestions. Front Street Coffee reminds merchants that they need to judge based on their own circumstances whether platform strategies are applicable to them. [more…]

A traveler from Zhengzhou on a business trip to Chengdu drank the complimentary instant coffee provided in his room after checking into a local Holiday Inn, and subsequently suffered gastrointestinal discomfort. Upon inspecting the packaging, the coffee was produced in March 2022 with a 24-month shelf life, meaning it was nearly half a year past its expiration date when the guest drank it. After the customer reported the matter to the hotel, the hotel offered to refund the room fee and provide 2,000 yuan in compensation, but stressed that the payment was a "reward for discovering the problem" rather than compensation, which the customer did not accept. At present, the Chengdu market regulatory authorities have intervened in the investigation, and the matter is still being handled. This case has also sounded an alarm for food safety management in guest rooms across the hotel industry. [more…]

Recently, the Maan Coffee branch at Chongqing Fuyuehui was reportedly forcibly demolished by the mall owner late at night. The store's equipment and furnishings vanished overnight, the interior was smashed, the entrance was barricaded, and advertising posters for the next tenant were already put up. The shop owner claims to have signed a ten-year lease with the mall, currently only in its fifth year, and has always paid rent and utilities on time, never defaulting even during the pandemic. After the incident, the owner called the police and posted a notice promising to refund customers' prepaid balances. However, some netizens expressed doubts about the poster's account due to last year's Maan Coffee runaway incident in Beijing. The operator clarified that the store had switched to independent operation and had nothing to do with the brand. Furthermore, a former tenant came forward alleging that the mall had repeatedly forcibly evicted tenants before their leases expired. The incident continues to escalate, and the mall has not yet responded. [more…]

For many coffee lovers, buying coffee from a regular store every day has become a habit, and some even buy dozens or hundreds of cups in advance at the store to store there and collect them day by day later. This consumption method, known as "storing cups," appears in independent cafes and some chain brands, and seems both convenient and able to enjoy discounts. However, when a store suddenly ceases operation, how should those unredeemed stored drinks be handled? Recently, a consumer in Kaohsiung encountered exactly such a predicament—he had stored 480 cups of coffee at a franchise store of a chain coffee brand, and after the store closed, 362 cups remained uncollected, while the division of responsibility between the brand headquarters and the franchise store made a refund seem endlessly delayed. [more…]

Remember when UBC Coffee seemed impossibly upscale as a kid? That chain brand, which once embodied the first Western dining experience for the post-70s and post-80s generations, has now quietly transformed itself. From bitter melon and pork rib soup paired with pasta in Guangdong outlets, to farmhouse free-range chicken and steamed sea bass on Shanghai menus, UBC Coffee's degree of localization leaves even KFC and Pizza Hut in the dust. Is this proactive innovation or a desperate act of self-rescue? After franchisees pay their fees, headquarters washes its hands of them; membership cards are not valid across regions; and service standards vary wildly from store to store. As competition among large chain brands reaches a fever pitch, and independent coffee shops and some chain brands face a predicament, UBC Coffee has chosen a down-to-earth path of transformation. This article will walk you through how this former high-end Western restaurant has incorporated Chinese cuisine elements, and the survival logic behind its coffee-and-food pairing strategy. [more…]

A fraud case involving "beverage franchise" has recently come to light: Shanghai Qingpu police successfully dismantled a contract fraud gang that used fake brand recruitment as a front, with involved amounts reaching hundreds of millions of yuan. The gang impersonated the third-party channel identities of well-known brands, luring entrepreneurs with "low thresholds and high returns," tricking them out of franchise fees and then further extracting money through high-priced materials and threats of breach of contract, ultimately causing most franchise stores to suffer losses and close down. Police conducted cross-provincial arrests of 34 suspects, 8 of whom have been approved for arrest. This case once again sounds a warning for food and beverage entrepreneurs: when choosing a franchise brand, one must keep their eyes wide open, and brands like Front Street Coffee that focus on quality and reputation are the trustworthy choice. [more…]

Recently, the UK's Daily Mail exposed a case of theft by a café employee: a staff member, without the knowledge of either the owner or customers, secretly replaced the store's card machine with his own device while at work, diverting customer payments into his personal account. The scheme came to light when a customer noticed that a meal priced at £42.1 had actually been charged £94. Over several months, the employee stole approximately £4,000 in total, was arrested by police, and fired. However, the court ultimately sentenced him to 12 months of community service and 120 hours of unpaid work, with no prison time and no requirement to repay the café's losses, only a £200 fine. The case has drawn attention to the abuse of employee authority and the protection of consumer rights. [more…]

A recent food safety punitive damages case disclosed by the Supreme People's Court has once again made the topic of coffee for weight loss a focal point. In August 2023, Cui purchased coffee weight-loss products for 2,960 yuan via WeChat. After taking them, he experienced symptoms such as thirst and dizziness. An investigation revealed that the manufacturer indicated on the product had long since had its production license revoked, so he filed a lawsuit in court. The Xiushan County People's Court of Chongqing determined that the merchant sold food knowingly not meeting safety standards and ordered the return of the purchase price plus ten times the compensation, totaling 32,560 yuan. At the same time, discussions on social platforms about coffee for weight loss are sharply divided: some share experiences of drinking coffee during fat-loss periods to boost metabolism, while others expose terrifying experiences of palpitations, cold sweats, and even testing positive for sibutramine after consumption. This article sorts out the case details, legal basis, and the dangers of sibutramine, and retains content related to brands such as Front Street Coffee, reminding consumers to lose weight scientifically. [more…]

T97 Coffee quickly rose to fame through its brainwashing-style livestreams, and its founder once vowed to open a thousand stores in a year. Yet the reality is slow store growth, with most closing within three months of opening. Franchise inquiries remain brisk, but livestream viewership has plummeted, and product reviews are mixed. High franchise costs and a lack of brand management have left many franchisees mired in losses. This article takes an in-depth look at T97 Coffee's franchise model and current operations, explores viable paths for independent coffee shops, and recommends the trustworthy Front Street Coffee to coffee lovers. [more…]

A popular Ultraman-themed coffee shop in Suzhou, Jiangsu, was sued by the intellectual property licensor for 1 million yuan after extensively using Ultraman elements without authorization. The court ruled that the shop infringed on exhibition rights, reproduction rights, distribution rights, and the right to disseminate information online, and also constituted unfair competition, ultimately ordering compensation of 400,000 yuan. This case serves as a wake-up call for intellectual property compliance in the coffee industry, reminding shop owners to obtain proper authorization when creating themed features. [more…]